Archive for March, 2008

Habits and Traditions

“We first make our habits, and then our habits make us” – John Dryden 1631-1700

What makes traditions so important to us? Why is “tradition” an easily accepted answer for many of the strange or odd habits we have?

Well, for one thing, children generally like to emulate their parents. So if their parents always did something specific or superstitional, chances are the children will do the same. Traditions are generally habits handed down from generation to generation, unless someone decides to start their own tradition themself. In a way, these traditions are comforting, if not always rational. One would probably feel comfortable doing what was always done, instead of breaking out of tradition. People don’t usually hold on to traditions because they understand what they are doing and think it is the right thing to do – often, they have no idea why they are doing the action. They do it because it is “tradition” and it is done, rarely for a specific or productive reason. Dryden was right – first the habits are made, and once we’ve been doing them for a while, these very habits affect us. Sometimes we even begin to shape our lives around them.

Traditions can be very good for a person. Perhaps a person’s routine allows them to get the most out of their day. If one is religious, especially if they understand the reasons for practicing their religion, then it is important for them to continue carrying on their traditions. Traditions can complete a person, make a person who they are (as Dryden said). This is not always a bad thing, if you think about it.

Habit and routine are great veils over our existence. As long as they are securely in place, we need not consider what life means; its meaning seems sufficiently incarnate in the triumph of the daily habit. When the social fabric is rent, however, man is suddenly thrust outside, away from the habits and norms he once accepted automatically. There, on the outside, his questioning begins.

- William Barrett Irrational Man

Barret makes it seem like people only feel secure within their habits and normalcy. According to Barrett, people do not question their traditions until the “fabric is rent”, until something makes them stop and think about what they are doing. Some do wait for a catalyst to make them think twice about their traditions. But there are those who question traditions every day – those who question their religion, schedule, or routines – with no “rent fabric”. Through this questioning comes change, sometimes for the better, sometimes not. Maybe more should step back and look critically at their own traditions, without a push, and perhaps improve their own lives.

Poetry – The Embarrassing Episode of Little Miss Muffet

I’m going to be posting some poems I like to read. This first one is a funny one by Guy Wetmore Carryl, who writes parodies of fairy tales and nursery rhymes. This is a favorite of mine. Enjoy! 

THE EMBARRASSING EPISODE OF LITTLE MISS MUFFET

by: Guy Wetmore Carryl (1873-1904)

  •  
      ITTLE Miss Muffet discovered a tuffet,
      (Which never occurred to the rest of us)
      And, as ’twas a June day, and just about noonday,
      She wanted to eat–like the rest of us:
      Her diet was whey, and I hasten to say
      It is wholesome and people grow fat on it.
      The spot being lonely, the lady not only
      Discovered the tuffet, but sat on it.
      A rivulet gabbled beside her and babbled,
      As rivulets always are thought to do,
      And dragon flies sported around and cavorted,
      As poets say dragon flies ought to do;
      When, glancing aside for a moment, she spied
      A horrible sight that brought fear to her,
      A hideous spider was sitting beside her,
      And most unavoidably near to her!
      Albeit unsightly, this creature politely Said:
      “Madam, I earnestly vow to you,
      I’m penitent that I did not bring my hat.
      I Should otherwise certainly bow to you.”
      Thought anxious to please, he was so ill at ease
      That he lost all his sense of propriety,
      And grew so inept that he clumsily stept
      In her plate–which is barred in Society.
      This curious error completed her terror;
      She shuddered, and growing much paler, not
      Only left tuffet, but dealt him a buffet
      Which doubled him up in a sailor knot.
      It should be explained that at this he was pained:
      He cried: “I have vexed you, no doubt of it!
      Your fists’s like a truncheon.” “You’re still in my luncheon,”
      Was all that she answered. “Get out of it!”
      And the Moral is this: Be it madam or miss
      To whom you have something to say,
      You are only absurd when you get in the curd
      But you’re rude when you get in the whey.

What are we doing?

vulture.jpg

   “What are we doing [to help the starving in third-world countries]?” is a good question, one I’m inclined to just answer with a quick “Nothing.” But that’s not so true – people do attempt to make known the horrors going on in different parts of the world. Kevin Carter’s picture of a starving Sudanese child being eyed by a vulture represents the problems we must attempt to solve, showing in a brutally honest and striking way what is happening behind our backs. But while the ”publicity” is a crucial part of the mission, just telling everyone that there is a problem doesn’t really solve anything, though it serves to enlighten people that something must be done. Maybe “What can we do?” is a more important question.

   “What are we doing?” could also be taken as a highly philosophical question, as in “What are we causing (perhaps by our indifference)?” I would probably say that we are causing a lot of damage, with little reparations. By ignoring that which occurs “far away”, we allow and perhaps even perpetuate the horrors that, in truth, are not so far away. We are turning our backs on a large part of the human race, beings from within our own species. No good can come out of a situation like this.